The GMO Debate technology debate topics

by countryHGFhjjh



บางทีไม่มีหัวข้อใดในความมั่นคงด้านอาหารที่จะกระตุ้นอารมณ์ได้มากไปกว่าสิ่งมีชีวิตดัดแปลงพันธุกรรม ผู้สนับสนุนปรบมือให้ GMOs เป็นนวัตกรรมที่เปลี่ยนแปลงเกม แต่ฝ่ายตรงข้ามกังวลเกี่ยวกับจริยธรรมและความเสี่ยงที่อาจเกิดขึ้นของ GMOs คณะกรรมการที่หลากหลายของเราได้พูดคุยกันอย่างตรงไปตรงมาเกี่ยวกับข้อกังวล รางวัล และอนาคตของการจัดหาอาหารของเราที่งาน Feeding the Planet Summit ดูเพิ่มเติมที่: .

Images related to the topic technology debate topics

The GMO Debate

The GMO Debate

Search related to the topic The GMO Debate

#GMO #Debate
The GMO Debate
technology debate topics
ดูวิธีการทำเงินออนไลน์ล่าสุดทั้งหมด: ดูเพิ่มเติมที่นี่
ดูวิธีการทำเงินออนไลน์ล่าสุดทั้งหมด: ดูเพิ่มเติมที่นี่

See also  होश उड़ा देने वाली 10 खतरनाक AGRICULTURE MACHINES | Top Most Advance Machines Technology Inventions technology machine

You may also like

29 comments

China put together this virus 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Its like the mob shows up and demands you pay for protection

Reply
yan k 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

thanks for sharing Planet Forward

Reply
Anna Nicole 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

This dark haired lady is ridiculously grinning and giggling. So hard to take her seriously because of her silly representation.

Reply
Dr. J 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Does Swiss dark chocolate contain genetically modified sugar or other GMO ingredients?

Reply
Deeksha 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Label the darn thing so ppl have the choice to opt out. Simple.

Reply
Sruthi 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

I’m just here cause my debate topic for school is on this and it’s the finals and I want to win the proposition that states that GMO foods should be banned

Reply
Fukushima is Revelation 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

I think it helps define the scope of the GMO issue when you include the word experimental when mentioning GMO because from either perspective of evolution or creationism GMO in the wild is irrational, from one perspective it took millions of years to evolve, from another perspective it took an infinitely intelligent creator to create, but here comes armies of thousands of phd graduates each year for 40 year careers to begin experimenting on creating new experimental GMOs so billions of people can eat the experimental gmos an become test subjects in the experimental GMO experiments with no idea of the long term impacts on mankind let alone the environment that the experimental gmos will forever alter once released into the earths biology, what could possible wrong? Who wants some experimental gmo corn, soy, canola, cotton, genetically modified so farmers could dump more cancer causing roundup on the crops? I don't mind if the government wants to fund gmo research under lvl 4 biolab biohazard conditions so long as they test it for a couple of human lifetimes before releasing the experimental gmos into the environment. What seems absurd to me is instead of performing common sense basic public safety policy creation regarding experimental gmo, Congress is instead subsidizing about $100 billion per year in experimental GMO crops per year in the wild millions of acres covered in experimental gmo crops already across America an it seems to me nobody is keeping track of all the various strains of experimental gmos they are releasing into the wild so that they could potential hold scientists criminally liable for the harm their experimental gmos do in wild. Privatizing profits while putting all the risks an costs of experimental gmo squarely on the back of the public is grossly irresponsible. Experimental GMO in the wild is right up there at the top of the list with all the other reckless irresponsible abuses of technology mankind has engaged in the last century such a nuclear power, an vaccine industry, digital fiat fractional reserve banking religion, an the 666 national identity foundations in China's society.

Reply
Grace J. Gniazdowska 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

I love science, science is great! I hate mad scientists, who think they

are smarter than God Himself. This crap is toxic, dangerous poison and we don't want it!!
Satan servants. Satan hates everything God
created, especially humanity, so he wants to destroy it and he uses
dumb, gullible scientists/ people to do it. The earth has more than enough to feed everyone, it is greedy corporations who make food un-affordable/inaccessible to people. The goons are everywhere, trying to discredit anyone, who reveals the truth about their crappy franken food. I don't want people experimenting
on me without my knowledge or consent, if it's so safe, why NOT label
it? You love it so much, YOU EAT IT.

Reply
Popeye Gordon 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Obsolete video. The GMO debate ended in 2016 and has been settled science for 2 full years now: https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2016/05/gmo-safety-debate-is-over/

Reply
Frank Collins 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

It looks like the host is being rude at 20:48

Reply
Armando Zessar 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

GMOs Corn with a reductions of 30 % in aflatoxins still not sufficiently enough for peoples' having immunitary problems.

Reply
open2626 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Why is so much money spent by Monsanto to keep food labeling from happening? Isn't that the least bit suspicious? I mean, millions of dollars are being spent to NOT allow GMO food labeling!? WTF?! That should be red flags all the way around!

Reply
frank odonnell 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

to start with CORN is raising hell with the health of every one from the sugar made from corn to the beef fattened un natural on grain /and Monsanto is poisoning every one with the G.M.O. it is time for people to get the true facts not big M.s propaganda///////

Reply
Fred Pauser 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Genetically engineering for benefit of humanity has potential, BUT, BUT, so far it includes only a few token gestures such as golden rice (whose benefit is not yet proven) which seem to be done for the purpose of getting the public to soften their hatred of companies such as Monsanto.

Pound by pound, bushel by bushel, at least 90% of GM corps contain genes for making them resistant to Monsanto's Roundup. Farmers accept that because it saves them work, BUT if you do sufficient research you will find that Roundup (billions of tons sprayed annually) are causing great damage to soil ecology. And animal tests LASTING FOR OVER 90 DAYS indicate serious health effects.

The lady on the panel who recommends crop rotation and more rational governmental support to farmers is the only one who talked some sense, although she is wrong to declare GM crops as "safe."

Overall, BIG MONEY is winning the propaganda war. Check out the rising health problems in the US and facts such as the US rating among the worst in the developed world for infant mortality. Why do you suppose that is???? Don't be fooled by Big Money propaganda.

Reply
clint525fuller 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

There was no public debate BEFORE this shit was rolled out.

Reply
Santiago Lara 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

genetically modified pesticides in our food, you can not wash off genetically modified chemicals built in corn Monsanto is full of shit

Reply
Wane Frame 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Lame debate! Lamest debate ever!! Seems like they Both support GMO. And is it me or they just glossing over the negatives of GMOs as if it's some game.

Reply
Hero of Legend 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

I think genetic modified food can be used for good if it is put into the right hands.  That's the thing with technology.  Though there is technology that can help improve overall quality of life it can also be misused.  It's never the technology itself but the person who uses it that determines it's worth.

Reply
Santiago Lara 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

why gmo's , why not natural food , stop fucking with our food, why is Monsanto saying they are trying to feed the world , and stop other farmers from growing natural food , Monsanto label you're gmo food let the people decide what they want to eat

Reply
Dennis Kinch 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Try to remember , like all improvements on things that are "good for you," poor people get what they can afford, usually, the stuff that's "bad for you." Fair trade, fair prices.

Reply
Upgrade To Uplift 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

I think we need to have a balance and STOP arguing about this. All that we need to do is collectively start thinking about the TRUE consequences that our current actions will create for our world in the future. GMOs are NOT good or bad, they're POTENTIALLY good AND potentially bad.
There's no need to go to extremes with this. If GM food can help more people not starve to death obviously that's good. If GM foods have pesticides IN them (so we have no choice but to eat toxins) than obviously that's bad. All technology has potential for good.
People who are against gmos aren't uneducated or stupid, they're concerned about their health and doing their best to remain healthy.
Organic is what we've always known and we do have to be very aware of how what we do now effects the wellbeing of our planet and EVERYTHING in it. If genetically modifying something will fuck things up in the future for our species and other species, then WE SHOULDN'T DO IT. If it will improve things for all beings on this planet, then I'm all for it.
The problem is, it's too new and there are people using the technology in a way that is definitely NOT beneficial. This makes things blurry.
Using this technology just to make more money will only bring destruction.
This is not black and white and there's no need for anger or harsh words. What's really needed is COOPPERATION between ALL experts to come up with solutions that are truly best for EVERYONE

Reply
J Mac 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-05/most-eu-countries-to-ban-cultivation-of-8-gmos-using-new-rules

Most EU Countries to Ban Cultivation of 8 GMOs Using New Rules

More than half of the European Union’s 28 nations plan to prohibit the cultivation of a group of genetically modified crops awaiting EU regulatory approval, marking the first use by individual governments of a new right to go their own way on the planting of biotech foods.

Reply
ItsOneInAMillion 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Can we just start calling the anti-GMOs pro-starvation or pro-poverty. That's all these people are. Absolutely despicable.

Reply
patricia johnson 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

Just part of the livestock…white sheep, black sheep,red sheep blue.all the same to the Shepard superior to you. You're fired …..i don't need you…too much live stock ,why should i do any thing to prolong your life…thanks for your service ..please leave my planet

Reply
patricia johnson 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

wtf………somebody need to slap that grin off her lying ass face….give me choice..let me know….what you hiding? you put everything else on labels….i smoke cigarettes….they used to be healthy too… American government impotent….drug dealers run the world……chemicals , drugs , same thing in your body…….Just the beginning..you are what you eat …what about the process of this cross breeding…killing us softly…real nature….thing of the past…fake boobs…false teeth…ass implants….ect..ain't nothing like the real thing ……soon we will have no choice …….opps …..too late about 20 years we been eating this weed killer cross breed seed …and so many was against health care…Really?….perfect storm..got us coming and going…….Rich folks are smart ain't they…..

Reply
J Mac 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

http://time.com/3990718/scotland-gmo-ban/
 
"The Scottish government announced Sunday that it will formally prohibit genetically modified crops. The country is utilizing new European Union rules that allow countries to opt out of EU-approved GM crops."

Reply
J Oliver 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

The seeds do not need to be free for the growers and consumers to net out positive.

Reply
J Mac 15/10/2021 - 5:49 PM

There is one GIANT glaring hole right in the middle all of the research and studies into GMO foods.

Do you honestly believe that is unintentional, that it is just a coincidence?

There have never been ANY long term toxicological feeding studies of Roundup
Ready crops and their associated herbicide Glyphosate.

Not one single feeding study of Roundup contaminated GMO Roundup Ready crops has ever been conducted.

No safety study of this specific type ever. Period. End of discussion.

Every single person who eats food should be asking themselves…

Why? Why is that one specific study that just so happens to be the thing we are most frequently eating as a result of this technology is absolutely 100% NON-EXISTENT?

Why?

Why is it that there was never a safety study conducted to replicate most closely the way the majority of people come into contact with GMO?

Doesn't this seem odd?

Doesn't science generally try to replicate real world exposure as closely as possible when conducting safety studies? And yet no long term feeding studies of what we are eating every day, which is Roundup contaminated Roundup Ready GMO crops that are hidden inside of 70% of all processed food.

Why?

The answer is obvious. No doubt Monstanto did their own study and found something very nasty in there. But those results if made public would stand in the way of billions of dollars in profit. So they have done everything in their power for over two decades to make sure that long term toxicological feeding studies of Roundup contaminated Roundup Ready crops are NEVER DONE.

The “pro GMO” or more accurately the anti long term safety study folks leaving comments and writing pro GMO articles work toward one end and that is to keep those safety studies from ever being done and to keep Roundup contaminated Roundup Ready crops on the market producing profit.
Obviously.

Their ongoing income stream is dependent on you and your family eating Roundup contaminated Roundup Ready crops.

Reply

Leave a Comment